Post by account_disabled on Jan 11, 2024 1:09:50 GMT -6
I have had the opportunity to check are hidden ( display:none ) Almost all the links I had the opportunity to check are associated with plugins released for free All the links I had the opportunity to check have been active for a long time, some for more than a year This means two things; the first (not negligible) is that obviously I cannot and have not been able to check 18 million links, the second thing is that it is not clear why the links detected are all hidden.
In this regard, I report two links, which are fundamental for understanding the Malaysia Phone Number List situation, which clearly indicate what the webmaster's behavior must be in relation to the promotion of his site. The first page can be reached through this address: support.google.com/webmasters/answer/66353?hl=it, while the second page can be reached through this address: blog.e-max.it /web-marketing-bologna/white-hat-seo.html Both pages say that it is forbidden to use the technique of hidden text and links. Note how, paradox of paradoxes, the second link is an article published via the official e-max blog. Here's what it says on the Google page .
in your content to manipulate your ranking in Google search results may be considered deceptive and is a violation of Google's Webmaster Guidelines .” Conclusions After a long introduction, the time comes to draw conclusions. However, I decide not to. In fact, I don't want to express judgments on the strategy adopted by e-max, this is not the point. I prefer you to do it. Indeed, I would like everyone to do their own checks and investigations in order to confirm or completely overturn the data reported in this article. What I want to do instead is open a discussion about Google and its role on the web. For this reason I take the title of the article and rewrite: “Google, champion of the web or incompetent referee?”
In this regard, I report two links, which are fundamental for understanding the Malaysia Phone Number List situation, which clearly indicate what the webmaster's behavior must be in relation to the promotion of his site. The first page can be reached through this address: support.google.com/webmasters/answer/66353?hl=it, while the second page can be reached through this address: blog.e-max.it /web-marketing-bologna/white-hat-seo.html Both pages say that it is forbidden to use the technique of hidden text and links. Note how, paradox of paradoxes, the second link is an article published via the official e-max blog. Here's what it says on the Google page .
in your content to manipulate your ranking in Google search results may be considered deceptive and is a violation of Google's Webmaster Guidelines .” Conclusions After a long introduction, the time comes to draw conclusions. However, I decide not to. In fact, I don't want to express judgments on the strategy adopted by e-max, this is not the point. I prefer you to do it. Indeed, I would like everyone to do their own checks and investigations in order to confirm or completely overturn the data reported in this article. What I want to do instead is open a discussion about Google and its role on the web. For this reason I take the title of the article and rewrite: “Google, champion of the web or incompetent referee?”